W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > December 2012

Re: issue-62 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:28:33 +0100
Message-ID: <50CA0231.1080208@w3.org>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
Thanks, Yves. I changed
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#lqissue-global
and the schema. The example files in the spec are still valid, so I 
think we can argue that this is "only" a clarification in the spec.

Best,

Felix

Am 13.12.12 04:53, schrieb Yves Savourel:
> Hi Felix, all,
>
> assuming the text in the PDF you sent would come just after:
>
> ----
> GLOBAL: The locQualityIssueRule element contains the following:
>
> A required selector attribute. It contains an absolute selector which selects the nodes to which this rule applies.
> ----
>
> Then yes. I think that would resolve the issue.
> As you noted, we would have to change the schema too.
>
> -yves
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:28 PM
> To: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: issue-62 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)
>
> Hi Yves, all,
>
> thanks for looking into this.
>
> Would it resolve your comment to
>
> - clarify the description like in the attached document? It doesn't add any attributes, but just re-orders the definitions.
> - change the related constraints in the schema accordingly?
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> Am 12.12.12 19:13, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think there is a description problem for the global rules for localization quality issue:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#lqissue-implementation
>>
>> For global rules the specification allows to have locQualityIssuesRef and the optional locQualityIssueSeverity, locQualityIssueProfileRef and locQualityIssueEnabled at the same time.
>>
>> But that contradicts the local rules where you can have only either standoff (with locQualityIssuesRef) or local on the node (with the other local attributes).
>>
>> It also makes little sense as the "complete override" aspect of ITS would render the attributes set in the global rule moot by the attributes in the standoff markup (or their absence).
>>
>> cheers,
>> -yves
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 16:29:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 December 2012 16:29:07 GMT