W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > December 2012

issue-62 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:27:56 +0100
Message-ID: <50C8DABC.2060502@w3.org>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
Hi Yves, all,

thanks for looking into this.

Would it resolve your comment to

- clarify the description like in the attached document? It doesn't add 
any attributes, but just re-orders the definitions.
- change the related constraints in the schema accordingly?

Best,

Felix

Am 12.12.12 19:13, schrieb Yves Savourel:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there is a description problem for the global rules for localization quality issue:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#lqissue-implementation
>
> For global rules the specification allows to have locQualityIssuesRef and the optional locQualityIssueSeverity, locQualityIssueProfileRef and locQualityIssueEnabled at the same time.
>
> But that contradicts the local rules where you can have only either standoff (with locQualityIssuesRef) or local on the node (with the other local attributes).
>
> It also makes little sense as the "complete override" aspect of ITS would render the attributes set in the global rule moot by the attributes in the standoff markup (or their absence).
>
> cheers,
> -yves
>
>
>
>
>



Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 19:28:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 12 December 2012 19:28:26 GMT