Re: issue-60 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD) from Arle Lommel on 2012-12-11 (public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org from December 2012)

From: Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:49:19 +0100
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <499AAE42-21D7-4A66-AD07-7DBCD3AFE124@dfki.de>

I would agree with Jirka in this case. No existing implementation would be affected by this, as far as I can tell. But we can discuss it.

-Arle

> Hi Felix,
> 
> is this really case which needs additional LC? Adding new value in a
> rather long enumeration is backward compatible with existing ITS markup
> and seems as a quite minor change for me.

Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 14:49:50 UTC