- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:49:32 -0500
- To: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: <public-modernguide@w3.org>
On 20 Oct 2012, at 5:34 AM, olivier Thereaux wrote: > > On 20 Oct 2012, at 05:19, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >>> • Tell me about your WG(s). >>> (Clarification question: size, activity, history, specific challenges) >> >> I think the first question may be too broad. I do think asking what the biggest challenges to getting work done is a good idea. Maybe not as the first question. > > Remember this is a conversation, not a survey. Asking about the WG is a very effective way to begin, and gives a lot of follow-up material, a la "so you said your group was very active. How do you…" > >> How about we ask these questions in a breakout session and treat it like a focus group? > > We can. Focus groups and interviews obviously yield different kinds of insights. I tend to prefer the quality and depth of one-on-one interviews - focus groups have a tendency to just amplify "obvious" concerns and feedback from usual loudmouths. But it's less time consuming. Why not. I don't mind doing both. I'm thinking here about the breakout session in particular. I welcome other suggestions for organizing the breakout session (especially given that I am not as far along as I wanted to be.) Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 12:49:34 UTC