W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > April 2009

Re: New bugs filed in Bugzilla to track changes

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:12:10 +0200
Message-ID: <49E88E3A.1020607@w3.org>
To: Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>
CC: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Thanks Abel,

Abel Rionda wrote:
> Hi Francois,
> 
> We have run out of time this week for a deep revision of this new
> version.

Nothing urgent, I just listed the tasks while I still had them in mind ;)


> Anyway, we have taken a glance at the new issues registered in Bugzilla.
> At first, Miguel and I will take care of the non-enhancement ones (we
> will comment you or directly fix them regarding the case).

Cool! I propose that we update bugs to "Assigned to" when we start 
working on them, not to work on the same thing.

Real changes to the moki format should probably be discussed and agreed 
upon first anyway (or kept for later, the Checker works fine as it 
stands, after all).


> 
> Regards,
> Abel.
> 
> PS: BTW, Impressive work you have done, Francois.

Well, thanks, but it's way easier to re-factor code when it exists and 
is already stable! ;)

Francois.


> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org] En nombre de Francois
> Daoust
> Enviado el: jueves, 16 de abril de 2009 17:24
> Para: public-mobileok-checker
> Asunto: New bugs filed in Bugzilla to track changes
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I updated the moki files of the test suites with the two following
> changes:
> - bug 6799 is fixed and the URI of external stylesheets needed to be 
> updated:
>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6799
> - empty HTTPError elements are not serialized anymore in the moki.
> 
> I also created "bugs" in Bugzilla to track changes that I think would be
> 
> worth doing. I haven't assigned them to anyone so far (which means Abel 
> must have received a few emails from Bugzilla ;)), so if people are 
> interested, feel free to jump in and/or send your comments!
> 
> I updated the code to have TODO texts reference bug numbers where 
> appropriate.
> 
> There is one real bug among the list:
>   bug 6818: Running the Checker on an image may return PASS or crash the
> 
> library
> 
> There are a few other TODOs that relate to exceptional situations that 
> I'm not sure we handle correctly. I will make some tests and report.
> 
> For the list of open bugs/enhancements, see:
>   http://tinyurl.com/dnjxjb
> ... starting with bug 6815.
> 
> Or in a longer form:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_typ
> e=allwordssubstr&bug_id=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=R
> EOPENED&bugidtype=include&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&email
> 1=&email2=&emailtype1=substring&emailtype2=substring&field-1-0-0=product
> &field-1-1-0=bug_status&field0-0-0=noop&keywords=&keywords_type=allwords
> &long_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&product=mobileOK%20Basic%20che
> cker&query_format=advanced&remaction=&short_desc=&short_desc_type=allwor
> dssubstr&status_whiteboard=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&type-1
> -0-0=anyexact&type-1-1-0=anyexact&type0-0-0=noop&value-1-0-0=mobileOK%20
> Basic%20checker&value-1-1-0=NEW%2CASSIGNED%2CREOPENED&value0-0-0=&votes=
> &order=bugs.bug_id&query_based_on=
> 
> Thanks,
> Francois.
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 14:12:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 April 2009 14:12:50 GMT