Le jeudi 13 mars 2008 à 12:50 -0400, olivier Thereaux a écrit : > On Mar 13, 2008, at 12:45 , Jo Rabin wrote: > > though I don't know that there is much we can do to change our > > dependency on CSS 1. > > Would a dependency on CSS 2.1 work, or is its status not "advanced" > enough in the REC track? I guess ideally we would have the syntax parsing based on the latest bug fixed made in CSS 2.1, but indeed, its REC-track status would be a blocker for us. DomReceived on Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:17:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:17:43 GMT