W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > March 2008

Re: [Fwd: MobileOK Validator Issues]

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:26:02 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0803111626l19249f8auf2069c4df80ebeb4@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
Cc: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
So is the emerging consensus to just ignore validation against the
stated DTD, if it's something we don't know about? Good, because that
is how I made it work just now.

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
>  Le mardi 11 mars 2008 à 21:54 +0000, Jo Rabin a écrit :
> > So I wonder what the value, really, is of testing against a declared DTD? The reason it is there, if I remember correctly, is to deal with XHTML-MP. But we do, anyway, so this is perhaps a legacy issue.
>  I remember having argued that we shouldn't care about
>  validity-to-declared DTD, but I think the group eventually chose to go
>  in a different direction...
>  Do - I told you so - m :)
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:26:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:26:22 GMT