Re: [Fwd: MobileOK Validator Issues]

So is the emerging consensus to just ignore validation against the
stated DTD, if it's something we don't know about? Good, because that
is how I made it work just now.

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
>
>  Le mardi 11 mars 2008 à 21:54 +0000, Jo Rabin a écrit :
>
> > So I wonder what the value, really, is of testing against a declared DTD? The reason it is there, if I remember correctly, is to deal with XHTML-MP. But we do, anyway, so this is perhaps a legacy issue.
>
>  I remember having argued that we shouldn't care about
>  validity-to-declared DTD, but I think the group eventually chose to go
>  in a different direction...
>
>  Do - I told you so - m :)
>
>