I'll get on these. On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > As I noted on my recent posts on statistics regarding the mobileOK > checker [1], the checker fails on a significant proportion of sites that > are submitted to it (17%). > > I have started to review these cases, and thus I'm posting new bugs > based on this research: > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__all__&product=mobileOK+Basic+checker&content= > > I think Sean is the only one notified of these new bugs at this time, > but I'm sure he wouldn't mind sharing the work load :) > > Dom > > 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Mar/0009.htmlReceived on Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:21:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:21:49 GMT