W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > July 2008

RE: Partial Object Elment Processing Rule update

From: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 09:18:44 +0200
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA52188281903CEC35E@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Cc: "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>



>>-----Mensaje original-----
>>De: Jo Rabin [mailto:jrabin@mtld.mobi]
>>Enviado el: viernes, 04 de julio de 2008 15:22
>>Para: Miguel Garcia
>>Asunto: Re: Partial Object Elment Processing Rule update
>>
>>OK, I think that there are 4 cases:
>>
>>RENDERED (or perhaps better, INCLUDED)
>>TASTED1 (retrieved and counts towards page weight - i.e. object with
no
>>type attribute )
>>TASTED2 (retrieved but does not count towards page weight - i.e.
object
>>with type="<unacceptable>" and Content-Type "unacceptable")
>>SKIPPED (not tasted, as a child of something that was RENDERED)
>>
>>It seems to me that you consider TASTED2 and SKIPPED together?
>>

Not exactly. I mark as SKIPPED "unacceptable" objects (that is the same
as TASTED2), it's just a different name. 

Child resources of RENDERED objects are not going to be added to moki so
no fouth value are needed for them.


>>Jo
>>
>>On 04/07/2008 12:49, Miguel Garcia wrote:
>>> Hi Jo,
>>>
>>>>> If I understand correctly you are saying that all TASTED objects
count
>>>>> towards EXTERNAL_RESOURCES and PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT - whereas the
intention
>>>>> is that only those
>>>>>
>>>>> a) that do not have a type attribute
>>>>> or
>>>>> b) that have type set to image/gif and image/jpeg
>>>>> or
>>>>> c) those that are actually image/gif and image/jpeg
>>>>>
>>>
>>> An object is marked as "TASTED" in moki if there is no type
attribute
>>> (case a), while remaining cases (b and c) are marked as "RENDERED".
Not
>>> sure, there is some discuss, if this difference among cases are
needed
>>> or could be enough a "DOWNLOADED" value which will hold all cases.
>>>
>>>>> e.g. specifically an object element with type attribute set to
>>> image/png
>>>>> which has media type image/png when tasted does not count towards
>>>>> EXTERNAL_RESOURCES or PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> This kind of objects (type attribute refers a non supported mime
type
>>> and the real resource is also not supported) will be recorded as
>>> SKIPPED.
>>>
>>>>> Regds
>>>>> Jo
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/07/2008 11:21, Miguel Garcia wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've just commited a partial implementation of object element
>>>>>> processing rule.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current implementation takes into account object nesting and
>>>>>> resources inside objects. Objects are now distinguished among
>>>>>> TASTED,RENDERED and SKIPPED [1]. TASTED and RENDERED ones count
>>> towards
>>>>>> EXTERNAL_RESOURCES and PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT whereas SKIPPED are
recorded
>>> on
>>>>>> moki only for OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPTS test. Any resource nested in an
>>>>>> RENDERED object is not considered Included Resource [2] so it
isn't
>>>>>> recorded into moki document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition Bug-5763 xml-stylesheet processing instructions has
been
>>>>>> fixed. [3]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, there is a problem on ExtendedCatalogResolver with last
version
>>>>>> (1.5) it crashes on Windows system if we launch the checker from
>>> command
>>>>>> line. In order to get it back to work we replaced it with
previous
>>>>>> version (1.4). We didn't make any commit regarding this issue
>>> because
>>>>>> version 1.5 changes come in order to fix a Jigsaw
incompatibility.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Miguel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2008Jul/0012
>>>>>> .html
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>
>>>
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/08
>>>>>> 0703#included_resources
>>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5763
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Received on Monday, 7 July 2008 07:19:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:19:14 GMT