W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Moki objectInfo attributes joined

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:11:17 +0100
Message-ID: <486CDE05.2030105@mtld.mobi>
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
CC: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org>, public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

To show that it was noted but skipped, I think. However, in the latest 
proposal for Object Element Processing, there is no skipping (aside from 
objects that are never reached because a compatible object ancestor is 


On 03/07/2008 12:15, Francois Daoust wrote:
> Hi, this all looks great!
> See my comment below.
> Miguel Garcia wrote:
>>  - loadtype="SKIPPED": the object resource isn't tasted nor rendered (an
>> object that isn't supported and its mime type is clearly stated on
>> markup by the type attribute), in this case children elements will be
>> processed.
> I'm wondering: why do we need to store skipped objects in the moki 
> document?
> Francois.
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 14:12:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:20 UTC