- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:11:17 +0100
- To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- CC: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org>, public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
To show that it was noted but skipped, I think. However, in the latest proposal for Object Element Processing, there is no skipping (aside from objects that are never reached because a compatible object ancestor is found). Jo On 03/07/2008 12:15, Francois Daoust wrote: > > Hi, this all looks great! > See my comment below. > > Miguel Garcia wrote: >> - loadtype="SKIPPED": the object resource isn't tasted nor rendered (an >> object that isn't supported and its mime type is clearly stated on >> markup by the type attribute), in this case children elements will be >> processed. > > I'm wondering: why do we need to store skipped objects in the moki > document? > > Francois. >
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 14:12:49 UTC