W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > January 2008

RE: Where we are with respect to beta

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:37:20 -0000
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4AD7C31@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>, "daniel" <daniel.appelquist@vodafone.com>

> The rest seem small enough that we could release a beta without them.
> 
> What do you all say to informally resolving that we should release a
> beta once 5370 is resolved satisfactorily?

I'd like to tie in with ACTION-594 [1] before taking that step.

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/594

Dan, where are we on that?

Jo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Owen
> Sent: 24 January 2008 17:30
> To: public-mobileok-checker
> Subject: Where we are with respect to beta
> 
> 
> Here is the list of open bugs, which is I believe up-to-date:
> 
> 5006    	min  	P2  	All  	jrabin@mtld.mobi  	NEW
Does a
> "tidied"
> element or attribute exist?
> 5012 	nor 	P2 	All 	srowen@google.com 	NEW
Test results
> need to
> state which document they refer to w...
> 5015 	nor 	P2 	All 	roland@7val.com 	NEW
Need working example
> for
> accessing line number in XSL
> 5020 	nor 	P2 	All 	rodonoghue@mtld.mobi 	NEW
Check what
> happens and
> decide what should happen when an ...
> 5022 	nor 	P2 	All 	miguel.garcia@fundacionctic... 	NEW
> 	https:
> handle expired certificates and warn
> 5138 	nor 	P2 	All 	miguel.garcia@fundacionctic... 	NEW
> 	Manage HTTP
> basic authentication
> 5358 	nor 	P2 	Linu 	abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org 	ASSI
No
> errors
> on HTTP errors
> 5361 	nor 	P2 	Linu 	dom@w3.org 	ASSI 		Missing
test cases
> 5370 	nor 	P2 	Linu 	srowen@google.com 	REOP
XHTML Basic/MP
> Validation
> 5385 	nor 	P2 	Linu 	srowen@google.com 	ASSI
Calculation of
> line
> position in XHTML doc
> 5391 	nor 	P2 	All 	srowen@google.com 	NEW
Record all
> <objects>s
> under <objects> in moki
> 
> We do not need to resolve all of them to release a beta. We don't have
> hard criteria about when to release a beta, other than that there
> should be no "major" bugs.
> 
> 5370 remains, I think, a high priority. Either we need to declare only
> Java 5 is supported, put conditions on how it is run, or somehow
> resolve this.
> 
> 5022/5138/5358 are in progress or done?
> 
> The rest seem small enough that we could release a beta without them.
> 
> What do you all say to informally resolving that we should release a
> beta once 5370 is resolved satisfactorily?
> 
> Sean
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 17:37:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 January 2008 17:37:40 GMT