W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Crash

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:44:03 -0500
Message-ID: <e920a71c0801211644g654e86fcpa77f763a157f7939@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, hf@isdn-capi.de
Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org

Yep none of this should actually depend on any external server -- this
has been fixed up (? still running down a bug or two) in the very
latest code. If you are feeling adventurous, try building the latest
code from CVS and running that, and you should hopefully not encounter
this. These any many other fixes will be released soon with our "beta"
release of the checker.

On Jan 21, 2008 10:33 AM, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
>
> Ooops
>
> I meant to add that we shouldn't be retrieving the DTD from the location
> in the System ID anyway - partly because we should be caching it, but
> partly because the location could contain a bogus DTD. Not that I
> imagine that many people would be so desperate for mobileOK that they
> would go to those lengths, rather than fix the mark up ...
>
> Jo
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> > checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jo Rabin
> > Sent: 21 January 2008 15:29
> > To: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
>
> > Subject: RE: Crash
> >
> >
> > Hmmm, that's a problem - this is the relevant bit from the conformance
> > section of XHTMP MP 1.0 - which says the system identifier can be
> > modified. That's more like MUST be modified it seems.
> >
> > I wonder if OMA is aware of this problem - or if this is jest a
> > temporary glitch with the server?
> >
> > Jo
> >
> >
> > 4. There MUST be a DOCTYPE declaration in the document prior to the
> root
> > element, with a public identifier.
> >
> > The public identifier included in the DOCTYPE declaration must
> reference
> > the DTD found in Appendix A using its Formal Public Identifier. The
> > system identifier may be modified appropriately. For example,
> <!DOCTYPE
> > html PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN"
> > "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd">
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-mobileok-
> > > checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Herwig Feichtinger
> > > Sent: 21 January 2008 14:29
> > > To: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: Crash
> > >
> > >
> > > The problem mentioned a few minutes ago might be caused by the
> > response
> > > "Invalid hostname" which www.wapforum.org currently returns.
> > >
> > > The WAP Forum has consolidated into the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA)
> and
> > no
> > > longer exists as an independent organization - and now even their
> > website
> > > has gone, including the DTD files.
> > >
> > > I guess I'll have to adapt the DTD...  :-)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Herwig
> >
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 00:44:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 January 2008 00:44:17 GMT