W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Parsing of objects for images

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:08:11 -0500
Message-ID: <e920a71c0801171408g5e341f4k2901971e2e7ff5ca@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

I like this take on it.

On Jan 17, 2008 10:53 AM, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
>
> Seems to me that actually they should only be recorded under objects and
> that the image tests should be applied both to images and to
> objects-that-are-images. I say this really just because it preserves the
> generality of moki.
>
> Jo
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> > checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Hazael-Massieux
> > Sent: 17 January 2008 14:03
> > To: public-mobileok-checker
> > Subject: Parsing of objects for images
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently objects whose content type starts with "image/" gets
> described
> > in the <images> list in the moki document.
> >
> > I think this should only happen for objects of content-type image/gif
> > and image/jpeg (since we do indeed want to make sure those are valid,
> > non-transparent, etc), and that even in that case, they should show
> > under the <objects> list so that we can make more easily the tests
> about
> > objects nesting.
> >
> > Any objection?
> >
> > Dom
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 22:08:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 January 2008 22:08:22 GMT