W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Last item for beta -- new MAIN_DOCUMENT test

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:15:15 -0500
Message-ID: <e920a71c0802070815o2c6c4721s6d6ef7b243bd24e7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Abel Rionda" <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

This came up on the call today. There is I think some question about
whether this representation is the right one in the test document
because this looks like we are talking about a test called
"MAIN_DOCUMENT" when there is none defined in mobileOK Basic.

I personally think this representation is OK, as it was not entirely
clear from mobileOK how to represent errors of this kind. It seems
this TF doesn't have a specific problem with it. So I think we should
proceed with this representation, and probably amend mobileOK Basic in
the next version to mention this.

If that is satisfactory, let's proceed with the beta. Let's also not
make any changes at this point since we've been trying to complete a
stable release for weeks.


On Feb 6, 2008 4:22 AM, Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org> wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> >we don't really define a "MAIN_DOCUMENT" test
> >in mobileOK Basic and just imply that if the test document can't be
> >retrieved, the other test results don't have meaning.
> Yes, we created MAIN_DOCUMENT element for grouping HTTP_RESPONSE_* and
> META_HTTP_EQUIV_* outcomes related to main resource under test.
> But some of these outcomes are simply WARNs and we think that makes
> sense
> passing the rest of mobileOK tests. Moreover, we consider
> as the only one in which it does not make sense passing the rest of the
> tests (Because we do not have any response at all). The current
> behaviour in this case is that the following exception is raised:
> "Exception in thread "main" org.w3c.mwi.mobileok.basic.TestException: A
> network error has happened while retrieving the requested Web page.
> MobileOK Basic Test can not be launched."
> More info of this issue can be found in thread [1]
> What do you think of that?
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2008Jan/0109
> .html
> CTIC folks.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org] En nombre de Sean Owen
> Enviado el: martes, 05 de febrero de 2008 6:03
> Para: public-mobileok-checker
> Asunto: Last item for beta -- new MAIN_DOCUMENT test
> Currently the unit tests fail, each of them, since there is a new test
> result titled "MAIN_DOCUMENT". Just checking that we're all OK with
> introducing this new element to cover, I assume, errors that occur in
> the document as a whole? we don't really define a "MAIN_DOCUMENT" test
> in mobileOK Basic and just imply that if the test document can't be
> retrieved, the other test results don't have meaning.
> I don't mind the current setup, just checking for opinion on this
> before we bless this as a beta.
> Sean
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 16:15:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:20 UTC