W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > February 2008

RE: Last item for beta -- new MAIN_DOCUMENT test

From: Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:22:25 +0100
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA52188281902E978ED@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>, "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>


Hi Sean,

>we don't really define a "MAIN_DOCUMENT" test
>in mobileOK Basic and just imply that if the test document can't be
>retrieved, the other test results don't have meaning.

Yes, we created MAIN_DOCUMENT element for grouping HTTP_RESPONSE_* and
META_HTTP_EQUIV_* outcomes related to main resource under test.
But some of these outcomes are simply WARNs and we think that makes
sense
passing the rest of mobileOK tests. Moreover, we consider
HTTP_RESPONSE_1
as the only one in which it does not make sense passing the rest of the
tests (Because we do not have any response at all). The current
behaviour in this case is that the following exception is raised:

"Exception in thread "main" org.w3c.mwi.mobileok.basic.TestException: A
network error has happened while retrieving the requested Web page.
MobileOK Basic Test can not be launched."

More info of this issue can be found in thread [1]
What do you think of that?


[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobileok-checker/2008Jan/0109
.html 

CTIC folks.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org] En nombre de Sean Owen
Enviado el: martes, 05 de febrero de 2008 6:03
Para: public-mobileok-checker
Asunto: Last item for beta -- new MAIN_DOCUMENT test


Currently the unit tests fail, each of them, since there is a new test
result titled "MAIN_DOCUMENT". Just checking that we're all OK with
introducing this new element to cover, I assume, errors that occur in
the document as a whole? we don't really define a "MAIN_DOCUMENT" test
in mobileOK Basic and just imply that if the test document can't be
retrieved, the other test results don't have meaning.

I don't mind the current setup, just checking for opinion on this
before we bless this as a beta.

Sean
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 09:21:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2008 09:21:49 GMT