W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > August 2008

Moki schema update for v1.0 release

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:38:26 +0200
Message-ID: <48983BB2.2060403@w3.org>
To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

Hi Jo,

Since you raised it on IRC the other day, I thought I would see what 
needs to be done there. Nice schema. I wished I had taken a look at the 
moki/ subdirectory before actually...

AFAICT, the only changes we've introduced in the moki schema since the 
release of the beta version are:

1/ moki:imageInfo may now be returned for moki:object elements. It is 
only defined when the object was retrieved (i.e. not SKIPPED):

<xs:element name="object">
  <xs:complexType>
   <xs:sequence>
    <xs:element ref="moki:URI"/>
    <xs:element ref="moki:retrieval"/>
    <xs:element ref="moki:objectInfo"/>
    <xs:element ref="moki:imageInfo" minOccurs="0"/>
   </xs:sequence>
  </xs:complexType>
</xs:element>


2/ the "loadtype" attribute was added to the moki:objectInfo element. 
Its possible values are:
   RENDERED: the object is an Included Resource
   TASTED: the object is not an Included Resource, but counts towards 
EXTERNAL_RESOURCES and PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT totals. In practice, objects 
defined without a type attribute and whose Content-Type is neither 
image/jpeg nor image/gif
   SKIPPED: the object is not an Included Resource, and does not count 
towards EXTERNAL_RESOURCES and PAGE_SIZE_LIMITS totals. In practice, 
objects defined with a type attribute whose Content-Type is neither 
image/jpeg, nor image/gif.

<xs:element name="objectInfo">
  <xs:complexType>
   <xs:attribute name="loadtype" use="required"/>
   <xs:attribute name="type" use="required"/>
  </xs:complexType>
</xs:element>

I thought I would go and make the changes myself, but there seems to be 
some magic button to push that generates the different pages, so I do 
not want to break anything.

Do you think you could update the schema so that we can publish a 
"clean" version 1.0 of the checker?

Francois.
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 11:38:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 August 2008 11:38:07 GMT