W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > September 2007

Re: mobileOKBasicDocCheckerSyncTest

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:28:16 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0709181228v149e50d0lee5136bb69f896d1@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
The mobileOK document uses 'warn', at least in the last couple drafts:

I think this is the intended convention in any event.

On 9/18/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote:
> > I think we explicitly used "warn" instead of "WARN" in the test text
> > to avoid confusion. I don't think it's a big deal, but would like to
> > see "warn" used everywhere for consistency, including test output.
> Actually test use warn, the mobileOK doc use WARN.
> Is this a (one of the last) comments for the mobileOK LC 3 Candidate?
>   Roland
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:28:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:19 UTC