- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:33:27 -0400
- To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
On 10/16/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > > Raw headers are well raw. The "cooked" headers are sorted > > alphabetically, which may explain the difference you see. > > Minor quibble but don't think they should really be sorted according to > my latest visits to RFC2616. But doesn't matter terribly, either, > afaics. Minor comment on this -- yeah I the raw headers are not sorted to preserve the original ordering. The ordering in moki is up to us and doesn't really matter. Keeping things sorted sure makes regression tests easier, and the repeatability is probably a good thing more generally.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 00:33:41 UTC