W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > October 2007

RE: Draft for the user manual

From: Ignacio Marin <ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:12:30 +0200
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA52188281902795EF7@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>, "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Cc: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

> I don't know if it's changed, but those two lines can still be
> executed. Specifying -m for examples suppresses System.out output, and
> writes to a file. But if no argument is supplied to -m either, nothing
> is output. This at least is how I remember it working in the past.

Yes. It is said in 3.1.2 Command line usage, but completely as -m with
no argument to it was not mentioned. Applying due test there.

Nacho


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Sean Owen [mailto:srowen@google.com] 
Enviado el: martes, 16 de octubre de 2007 15:32
Para: Jo Rabin
CC: Ignacio Marin; public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Asunto: Re: Draft for the user manual

On 10/16/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> (Actually, I guess the format of the command line has changed at some
point,
> I recall being able to suppress moki output and results output as well
as
> put them in a file - so there is some redundant code is Tester now -
lines
> 128 and 142 can't ever actually get executed?)

I don't know if it's changed, but those two lines can still be
executed. Specifying -m for examples suppresses System.out output, and
writes to a file. But if no argument is supplied to -m either, nothing
is output. This at least is how I remember it working in the past.

> > Finally, the JAR did not seem to be there so we submitted it to the
CVS in
> the root.
>
> Ah yes, I see it. Should it be in CVS or should it be somewhere else
as a
> downloadable for people uninterested in the code?

Here's the link to it from web CVS:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2007/mobileok-ref/mobileOK-Basic-RI-
1.0-deploy.jar?rev=1.1&only_with_tag=HEAD

It's buildable from code with the "build release" target but of course
providing a direct download to the compiled binary is good, yes.
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 14:12:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:04 GMT