W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > May 2007

RE: ACTION: The order of HTTP Headers

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:48:39 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4335E90@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>
Cc: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

> Meh, OK. I don't so much like the idea of not testing this output at
> all, though I agree that the real important output is the test results
> doc. I'll pull out the test.
> 

So do we still want to sort the headers etc.?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Owen [mailto:srowen@google.com]
> Sent: 23 May 2007 16:46
> To: Jo Rabin
> Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ACTION: The order of HTTP Headers
> 
> On 5/23/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> > What I don't understand is how we are to create the expected result
> > version of the moki doc. I think the main point is to make sure that
the
> > checker throws the right FAILs and WARNs for a given input. However,
I'm
> > not sure that one can test the operation of the pre-processor that
way.
> > So fwiw I'm all for including the moki doc in the output, just don't
> > make it part of the comparison. (and anyway, what about the things
that
> > _must_ change, like Date?)
> 
> Meh, OK. I don't so much like the idea of not testing this output at
> all, though I agree that the real important output is the test results
> doc. I'll pull out the test.
> 
> I had been special-casing Date fields and not failing on differences
> there.
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:49:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT