W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > May 2007

Re: ACTION: The order of HTTP Headers

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:46:16 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0705230846q290f007va2a7bc1cffb5a3e1@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org

On 5/23/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> What I don't understand is how we are to create the expected result
> version of the moki doc. I think the main point is to make sure that the
> checker throws the right FAILs and WARNs for a given input. However, I'm
> not sure that one can test the operation of the pre-processor that way.
> So fwiw I'm all for including the moki doc in the output, just don't
> make it part of the comparison. (and anyway, what about the things that
> _must_ change, like Date?)

Meh, OK. I don't so much like the idea of not testing this output at
all, though I agree that the real important output is the test results
doc. I'll pull out the test.

I had been special-casing Date fields and not failing on differences there.
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:46:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT