W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Checker F2F in Dublin 2/3 April

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:48:57 -0400
Message-ID: <815E07C915F39742A29E5587B3A7FA192A25C63B@lk0-cs0.int.link2exchange.com>
To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

Hi Shadi

As you correctly point out putting an agenda together soon is important.

I'm sure it would be most useful for you to be there, especially in
respect of your thoughts about extensibility.

Thanks
Jo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shadi Abou-Zahra
> Sent: 14 March 2007 18:40
> To: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Checker F2F in Dublin 2/3 April
> 
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I'm interested in attending as an observer on behalf of ERT WG for two
> reasons primary reasons:
> 
> 1. help clarify some of our documents and their usage (such as EARL,
> HTTP vocabulary, and Pointer Methods), and take back any feedback to
> Working Group from implementing these in the mobileOK checker;
> 
> 2. observe the development of the mobileOK checker for possible future
> reuse or extension for WCAG (note: there are no current plans for
this,
> just curious about any potential opportunities in the future).
> 
> Since the date for this meeting is quite soon and I already have other
> commitments during this period, I was curious about an agenda outline.
> Would my participation be helpful at this stage?
> 
> Regards,
>    Shadi
> 
> 
> Jo Rabin wrote:
> > That's great.
> >
> > Does this work for anyone from Spain - Abel, Nacho?
> >
> > Jo
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-mobileok-
> >> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Owen
> >> Sent: 13 March 2007 19:56
> >> To: Jo Rabin
> >> Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: Checker F2F in Dublin 2/3 April
> >>
> >>
> >> Fair enough. I was going to solve this through rapid capitulation.
:)
> >> seriously there is not a great deal of disagreement.
> >>
> >> But OK. I think I can justify a trip over there on these dates if
> >> someone will recommend a nice hotel and pub near where we're
meeting.
> >>
> >> Sean
> >>
> >> On 3/13/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> >>> I don't think we have a consistent point of view between all of us
> > on
> >>> this yet, and at the same time we have aggressive timescales and
no
> >>> concrete plan. I think that getting together to discuss is the
most
> >>> effective way of pulling this together.
> >>>
> >>> However, if a sufficient number of other people can't make it, or
> > don't
> >>> see the value then let's do the best we can with telecons and so
on.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps it would be useful if we summarise our sentiments in a
> > little
> >>> vote, and my votes are as follows:
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I see the value in having a F2F.
> >>> Yes, I can make it on the 2nd and 3rd in Dublin.
> >>> Yes, I'd be happy for it to be somewhere else on some other date.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
> Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
> WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
> Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
> 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
> Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 19:49:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:02 GMT