W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Another draft of test framework

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:27:21 -0500
Message-ID: <815E07C915F39742A29E5587B3A7FA1929992F42@lk0-cs0.int.link2exchange.com>
To: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

It all looks very interesting. I am concerned, as Sean says, about
giving the impression that is on an 'approved' course, and to that end I
suggest that a) we have a draft of the requirements and b) a picture of
the architecture as discussed on the last call.

On a) I am afraid that I am behind schedule but have started and will
try to circulate a preliminary draft before the next call.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Owen
> Sent: 02 March 2007 14:15
> To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux
> Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Another draft of test framework
> It's OK by me. My only slight hesitation is it may prematurely imply
> that this is basically the code we will use. If nobody has serious
> concerns about it, yeah let's put it in CVS.
> I had worked on this a little more last night to incorporate the
> latest EARL vocab changes, so, let me send you that update separately.
> Everyone who would like CVS access -- remember to get Dom you ssh
> Sean
> On 3/2/07, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> wrote:
> > Thanks for sending this! Do you mind if I put it in the CVS
> > At the very least, it would make it easier to browse through the
code on
> > the Web.
Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 14:27:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:17 UTC