W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Mobile Checker not working

From: Laura Holmes <holmes@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:31:06 -0400
Message-ID: <135a9f560706271031geba8e6nbd357dd1e7846acd@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
>
> Should we also return the position elements in the template?


As things are right now,  the lack of position element is not causing the
program to crash, but it was named in the specs you guys drew up. I'm still
figuring out how to acquire the information requested (document tidiness,
URL, and mokiID). They're on my ToDo list. If anyone has any quick
suggestions regarding these, let me know, otherwise I'll keep forging ahead.


For me right now, if you could update CVS with the best possible position
implementation you can, I can go ahead and work on inputting the values once
I figure things out. The position information is going to have to be there
eventually. I might as well know what format I'm working with. Let me know
if you have any questions.


In other xsl news, I'm also trying to figure out how to have the test
outcome displayed at the top of the result document. Is there some way to
overwrite that value after the tests have been performed, or some kind of
template call? As things stand right now, we just put in a dummy value into
the test outcome declaration, and then we leave it up to the individual
results to determine the real outcomes. However, after the test is
performed, if we have a test that we originally claimed passed, and then
failed on sub-tests, we still get a result document that says test outcome
pass but sub-results state failure.

One other possibility is striking the overall test "outcome" value from the
top of the result and just letting the rest of the test garner a pass or
fail outcome from the sub-results. Thoughts?


Cheers,
Laura
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 17:31:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT