W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Image size error reporting

From: Laura Holmes <holmes@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:58:39 -0400
Message-ID: <135a9f560707110658u5d2cf0cfs614a139b2a44b50c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Sweet. Sounds good.

As far as implementation, in order to get the line number, we're going to
have to call an external java function. The java function needs the current
node passed in as a parameter in order to obtain the line number stored in
the node as an attribute. Here's two solutions:

1) to reduce code bloat - pass the current node to the result function.
Within the results function we'll have to call the java function.
2) to reduce number objects passed between methods - call the java function
from within the individual test and then pass the line number to the result

Either way, we can pass a null value into the results function in the case
where we don't want to print a line number. I'm not entirely sure how xsl
works as far as memory or the groups thoughts regarding either of the two
issues mentioned above, but I'm tempted to advocate #1 just for clarity


On 7/10/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote:
> Laura,
> > Also, I'm still not quite sure what we determined about the
> > position information format for error reporting. Roland, are you
> > working on that?
> No (sorry for this late feedback for this short feedback).
> I try to add this feature at the weekend...
> Some ideas how this could be work:
> - call the result template with a new parameter:
> with-param name="position">true</
> ... return line position with the correct syntax
> Any ideas how the function should be work with the CSS check?
> Cheers,
>   Roland
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 13:58:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:18 UTC