W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Image size error reporting

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 17:13:18 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0707071413o3dfb34b0xf69bd047be0a0012@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Laura Holmes" <holmes@google.com>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

Do whatever is easiest. If there are errors, the only real requirement
is to report the first error encountered accurately. Beyond that, all
else is a bonus. I am more concerned with getting everything basically
working, and not adding any more complexity.

What's the issue with error position? we have a 'general' position
type that should always be used for image errors. There no such thing
as position for images -- I suppose you could refer to a byte that
didn't make sense but that doesn't seem useful or easy to obtain from
APIs.

Sean

On 7/6/07, Laura Holmes <holmes@google.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm working on the image resizing and specify test right now and I wanted to
> ask for opinions. Here are options for how it is implemented:
>
> 1) As is, we have a series of if statements testing both height and width
> (after we've established that indeed these tags are there). This means:
> - if we have a improperly formatted value, it records a test result value
> that reflects the improper formatting and a test result that either warns or
> fails depending on how the improper value is evaluated numerically
> - both width and height at evaluated simultaneously, so we can record the
> line number in which the error occurred, but not which value
>
> 2) We can choose not to proceed with the tests after it's been established
> that there's an improper value. However, if we stop here, if there's another
> issue with the properly formatted value, we never report that
>
> 3) We can test height and width values separately. If it is determined that
> the height or width is improperly formatted, we report that error, but
> continue testing the other value.
>
> Also, I'm still not quite sure what we determined about the position
> information format for error reporting. Roland, are you working on that?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Laura
>
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2007 21:13:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT