W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > July 2007

Re: ACTION 517 - caching of resources

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 05:10:50 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0707060210v4f9b60bevad711297fee92702@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ruadhan O'Donoghue" <rodonoghue@mtld.mobi>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org

I am inclined to 'keep it simple' and go this way. If we want to say
anything about foo.gif, and it's referenced 20 times in a document,
does it help us a lot to point to the first versus nth occurrence of
it?

Sean

On 7/6/07, Ruadhan O'Donoghue <rodonoghue@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> That seems like a sensible thing to do, but we run into problems when we
> want to record the position information of each reference to a unique
> resource into moki. If we return just a list of unique resources, then
> it means that we have to go back to the original document again at some
> point to extract the position information, which is inefficient.
>
> If we are happy not to include the position information of each
> reference to a resource, then sure, we can do it this way. But then we
> will know all the unique resources in a document, but not the number of
> times, or where, they occurred in that document.
>
> Ruadhan
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 09:10:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT