W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > February 2007

Teleconf at 10amET details (Was: TAW Checker approach)

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:49:36 +0100
To: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Message-Id: <1172479776.4041.39.camel@cumulustier>

Le jeudi 22 février 2007 à 11:45 -0500, Sean Owen a écrit :
> How to proceed? First, let's have that call we were talking about. How
> about 10am EST / 4pm CET, Monday, February 26? If anyone has an easy
> way to set up a conference bridge, go ahead. If I hear nothing I'll
> figure out how to set one up tomorrow.

I have made a reservation for 10 people at that time on Zakim; the
conference code is 26631, and I suggest we use #bpwg for that meeting.
W3C Zakim: +1.617.761.6200, + or +44.117.370.6152

> The key questions, in my view, are:
> A. We have three relevant implementations (Dom's, .mobi, TAW). I've
> gone off and started defining a fourth. Are we comfortable with that?
> The fourth implementation's goal is to be independent of anyone's
> particular usage or deployment, but, also conceivable usable by the
> W3C and .mobi and TAW.

As I said before, I'm happy to use any result that this group would
produce and that would improve over the current situation for the W3C

> B. Ownership. Things get done when they have owners, and in software,
> one architect is good.


>  I have the time and willingness to drive this,
> but, am concerned I won't fairly represent the design goals of
> everyone (in particular regarding points 1 and 2 above.) So... who
> else wants to work a lot on this and can start writing code?

I personally don't think the current points of disagreements are such
that they should prevent you from taking the lead on this - but that may
be because I actually rather agree with you :)

> C. Find a resolution to items 1, 2 and 3 above.
> D. Next milestone -- what can we do before the final release of
> mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0

Sounds like a nice agenda for the call, indeed.

Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 08:51:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:17 UTC