> So then you can flip the question round. If you're building a meta- > doc for audit purposes anyway, why *wouldn't* you use it as the > test subject You are right. If we could build a meta-xml-doc that defines the test-runs (HTTP headers, document encoding, XPath Queries, image formats, ...) and the validator returns this xml doc with a result for each test run, the question about the implementation language is not important. I think, the next step is to define this meta-xml-doc format and the test-run types (headers, encoding, XPath, ...) and discuss the test run's. RolandReceived on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 08:14:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:02 GMT