- From: Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:13:56 +0100
- To: James G Pearce <jpearce@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> So then you can flip the question round. If you're building a meta- > doc for audit purposes anyway, why *wouldn't* you use it as the > test subject You are right. If we could build a meta-xml-doc that defines the test-runs (HTTP headers, document encoding, XPath Queries, image formats, ...) and the validator returns this xml doc with a result for each test run, the question about the implementation language is not important. I think, the next step is to define this meta-xml-doc format and the test-run types (headers, encoding, XPath, ...) and discuss the test run's. Roland
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 08:14:31 UTC