W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > August 2007

RE: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:23:31 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4600716@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>
Cc: Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>, "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

Just to be clear on this, the warn and FAIL Ids have just been introduced in the latest Editors Draft ... so I am a bit worried that we are talking at crossed purposes ...



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Owen [mailto:srowen@google.com]
> Sent: 30 August 2007 15:16
> To: Jo Rabin
> Cc: Roland Gülle; public-mobileok-checker
> Subject: Re: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf
> 
> To be clear, if you mean the implementation should use exactly the
> same names as in the test document, yes. The document should not
> change to accommodate the tests, of course, since those identifiers
> have been in use in public drafts for a while.
> 
> Sean
> 
> On 8/30/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> > > So the solution is to change the test and result names to the
> > > mobileOK basic doc style.
> > > Is this correct?
> > >
> >
> > I'm happy with that.
> > Jo
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 17:23:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT