W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > August 2007

RE: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:28:45 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B460067A@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>
Cc: "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

Ooops, one more thing: we are going to be adding a couple of warns and FAILs over the next couple of days. Either we can add them like _1a, _1b or we can renumber when they are inserted. If the latter then I suggest you hold off till that is done ...

Jo


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jo Rabin
> Sent: 30 August 2007 11:26
> To: Roland Gülle
> Cc: public-mobileok-checker
> Subject: RE: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roland Gülle [mailto:roland@7val.com]
> > Sent: 30 August 2007 11:22
> > To: Jo Rabin
> > Cc: public-mobileok-checker
> > Subject: Re: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf
> >
> > >> I like the short ID more than the actually IDs used in the tests.
> > >> My proposal is that Jo define the IDs in the mobileOK Basic doc and I
> > >> change them in the XSLT tests.
> > >
> > > I'm not short of things to do so am happy with the idea that you do
> > > the work!
> > >
> > > I suppose there is merit in the idea that the name of the test
> > > should be the same as the name of the relevant section of the
> > > document + a number, so that is another argument for doing it your
> > > way ...
> > So the solution is to change the test and result names to the
> > mobileOK basic doc style.
> > Is this correct?
> >
> 
> I'm happy with that.
> Jo
> 
> > If so, I'll start the walk through the tests.
> >
> >   Roland
> 
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:29:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:03 GMT