Ooops, one more thing: we are going to be adding a couple of warns and FAILs over the next couple of days. Either we can add them like _1a, _1b or we can renumber when they are inserted. If the latter then I suggest you hold off till that is done ... Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok- > checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jo Rabin > Sent: 30 August 2007 11:26 > To: Roland Gülle > Cc: public-mobileok-checker > Subject: RE: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Roland Gülle [mailto:roland@7val.com] > > Sent: 30 August 2007 11:22 > > To: Jo Rabin > > Cc: public-mobileok-checker > > Subject: Re: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf > > > > >> I like the short ID more than the actually IDs used in the tests. > > >> My proposal is that Jo define the IDs in the mobileOK Basic doc and I > > >> change them in the XSLT tests. > > > > > > I'm not short of things to do so am happy with the idea that you do > > > the work! > > > > > > I suppose there is merit in the idea that the name of the test > > > should be the same as the name of the relevant section of the > > > document + a number, so that is another argument for doing it your > > > way ... > > So the solution is to change the test and result names to the > > mobileOK basic doc style. > > Is this correct? > > > > I'm happy with that. > Jo > > > If so, I'll start the walk through the tests. > > > > Roland >Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:29:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:19 UTC