RE: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf

Ooops, one more thing: we are going to be adding a couple of warns and FAILs over the next couple of days. Either we can add them like _1a, _1b or we can renumber when they are inserted. If the latter then I suggest you hold off till that is done ...

Jo


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-
> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jo Rabin
> Sent: 30 August 2007 11:26
> To: Roland Gülle
> Cc: public-mobileok-checker
> Subject: RE: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roland Gülle [mailto:roland@7val.com]
> > Sent: 30 August 2007 11:22
> > To: Jo Rabin
> > Cc: public-mobileok-checker
> > Subject: Re: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf
> >
> > >> I like the short ID more than the actually IDs used in the tests.
> > >> My proposal is that Jo define the IDs in the mobileOK Basic doc and I
> > >> change them in the XSLT tests.
> > >
> > > I'm not short of things to do so am happy with the idea that you do
> > > the work!
> > >
> > > I suppose there is merit in the idea that the name of the test
> > > should be the same as the name of the relevant section of the
> > > document + a number, so that is another argument for doing it your
> > > way ...
> > So the solution is to change the test and result names to the
> > mobileOK basic doc style.
> > Is this correct?
> >
> 
> I'm happy with that.
> Jo
> 
> > If so, I'll start the walk through the tests.
> >
> >   Roland
>