W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Ready to commit more code updates

From: Abel Rionda <abel.rionda@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:14:29 +0200
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA521882819020049D3@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>

Hi Sean,

We have revised your last code update focusing in the 
pre-processor part of the checker. Also we have made
a draft for graphics for spacing test. (All classes
modified are attached). 

The following questions and comments were raised:

*The PreprocessorResult class should provide methods
 for accessing included resources.(CSS and Images).
 In general this class should have all the information
 for the tests and for the construction of the 
 intermediate document?

* For image resources we made a generic class HTTPImageResource which provides the methods needed to implement our test case (GraphicsForSpacingTest).
In particular we needed methods to get real measures and transparency.

* GraphicsForSpacingTest just uses the information in the PreprocessorResult to fulfil the test. Other tests will supply information to include in the intermediate document. Should this info added to the PreprocessorResult object or managed separately until we construct the intermediate document?

The relationship between PreprocessorResult-TestContext-IntermediateDocument is in an early stage and we must put our efforts on it.


-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org] En nombre de Sean Owen
Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de abril de 2007 8:45
Para: Ignacio Marin; public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Asunto: Re: Ready to commit more code updates

PS I finally committed some updates to CVS. It's still kind of a mess
but useful as a point of discussion. Testing code is in there, plus
use of JHOVE, SAC and Batik for CSS and JPEG parsing.

Let's focus again on the preprocessor output doc since that will
really drive the core structure to a stable state. This is going to be
a lot of work but will be straightforward once the structure is in

OK, next week is out because of Darmstadt. Can we informally convene
after the BPWG call on Thursday (which ends at 11:30am EST)?

The week after next, is Tuesday 10am still the best time then?


On 4/16/07, Ignacio Marin <ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org> wrote:
> The problem here in CTIC is that Abel and I will be in Darmstadt all the
> week through (next week, I mean). I am afraid that Jo is in the same
> case.
> Looking forward to checking the new version in the CVS to try to help to
> make advances.
> Regards,
> Nacho

Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 12:15:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:18 UTC