Comments for 2.2 SC Instructions for Custom Gestures or Movement (MATF Action 76)

Hi Jake, list
I have dealt with my action 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/track/actions/76 and commented 
the draft SC

2.2 SC Instructions for Custom Gestures or  Movement
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouVFq4w-i0rchNHtTAG_JoRwHfYm9mN2MkxFBct1JSI/edit#heading=h.7dwp8clu8tbl

Detlev

Am 20.06.2019 um 20:03 schrieb Abma, J.D. (Jake):


>
> Also posted this one a week ago: 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UEYHcAfOqg​
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Kim Patch <kim@redstartsystems.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 20, 2019 6:24 PM
> *To:* public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
> *Subject:* MATF Minutes June 20, 2019
> *MATF Minutes June 20, 2019 link: 
> https://www.w3.org/2019/06/20-mobile-a11y-minutes.html
>
> *Mobile Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
>
>
>     20 Jun 2019
>
>
>     Attendees
>
> Present
>     MarcJohlic, jon_avila, Kim, Detlev, Jennifer, Jake 
> Regrets
>
> Chair
>     Kimberly_Patch 
> Scribe
>     Detlev 
>
>
>     Contents
>
>   * Topics
>     <https://www.w3.org/2019/06/20-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#agenda>
>      1. touch target spacing
>         <https://www.w3.org/2019/06/20-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#item01>
>   * Summary of Action Items
>     <https://www.w3.org/2019/06/20-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ActionSummary>
>
>   * Summary of Resolutions
>     <https://www.w3.org/2019/06/20-mobile-a11y-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Kim: Apple announced iOS13
>
> <kim> TOPIC iOS13 update accessibility
>
> Jennifer: Promis that many things will be more accessible
> ... default font would be a Mac type
> ... pre-rogrammed accessibility labels
>
> <kim> https://www.apple.com/ios/ios-13-preview/features/ 
> <https://www.apple.com/ios/ios-13-preview/features/>
>
> Kim: Changes look significant
> ... more voice control options enabled
> ... historically you can't do much inside programs, so thi sis 
> building speech into the OS better
> ... with Siri you can do everything - use grid, show labels
> ... turn it on and off, even of. say label
> ... wil be good example of instructional text
> ... Text about a11y has changed under "even more"
> ...Marc: Voice options listed at the top of Accessibility now
>
> Jennifer: Will be easier to set up a11y settings out of the box
> ... Not so deeply nested, A11y now higher up the hierarchy
>
> Kim: Another good thing is text editing - more gestures
> ... haven't tried them yet
> ... also more keyboard shortcuts
>
> Detlev: Any improvement for keyboard access on iOS with external keyboard?
>
> Kim: iPad and iPhone split off, iPad haviong more options like opening 
> the desktop version of web sites
>
> Jennifer: Should be able to use voice control to assign gestures to a 
> voice command so you can execute gestures with voice
>
> Kim: dev version is out, not public
> ... Has been in the works a long time, looks like deeply integrated stuff
> ... Not sure how far "comprehensive voice operation" goes
> ... important would be to let users customise commands - not sure if 
> that is included
> ... possible on Mac, not sure if implemented also in iOS13
>
> Detlev: hopes keyboard operability on iOS has changed
>
> Jennifer: Android Q is out?
>
> Jon: confirms.
>
> Some new APIs
>
> <jon_avila> https://developer.android.com/preview/features 
> <https://developer.android.com/preview/features>
>
> Kim: Looks like it is all implemented (Android)
>
> Marc: Not lloking as robust
>
> Jon: Focus is more on other features (not a11y)
> ... a111y timeouts, shortcut stuff
>
> Kim: What are the things you want from mobile operating systems?
>
> Jennifer: friend tried Android phone, but could not use it
>
> Detlev: used to be more sluggish regarding gesture input
>
> Jake: report about a guy who was forced to use an Android device 
> because iphone was broken
> ..conclusion: if there was better Braille support his next phone would 
> be an Android device
>
> Jon: Voice Access (which used to be beta) ...
>
> Jake: does its job but not as good as iOS, maybe dwon to accent a bit
>
> <kim> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wRAViPfAJ4Ytqc71tGZp6gU07HNd2QQaNgtJsog-D90/edit#gid=124994642
>
> <kim> 
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Q9md2AvmeTgvsT9GB62BsGvCaalDGtE6
>
> Kim: Jake - is there stuff from last call (on gesture hints) - talk 
> more about it?
>
> Jake: Most changes were wording changes
>
> <kim> v
>
> <kim> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ouVFq4w-i0rchNHtTAG_JoRwHfYm9mN2MkxFBct1JSI/edit
>
> Detlev: apologies for not havign read it - promis to read!
>
> Jake: Input welcome
>
> <scribe> *ACTION:* Detlev read doc, give feedback
>
> <trackbot> Created ACTION-76 - Read doc, give feedback [on Detlev 
> Fischer - due 2019-06-27].
>
> <kim> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NEDLUWt_VFKtdHhcgm4j-ssWguSGeY8fhdSxm_41WzU/edit#heading=h.mntlv4jvrc29
>
> Kim: Portrait/ Landscape, different content
>
> <kim> TOPIC portrait/landscape
>
> <jon_avila> the essential part seems incorrect as it talks about gestures
>
> Jake: Not sure what the status of this doc is, could be an older version
> ... lets skip it for no and go to touch target
>
>
>       touch target spacing
>
> Jake: was discussed on call Tues
>
> Jon: reports concerns that touch target space between might not be 
> (easily) testable
>
> <kim> TOPIC concern about touch target testing
>
> Jake: Comments were pointing out that if you define layout via 
> percentages of flex not css pixels you might get different distances 
> so space will depend on viewport width etc.
> ... so measurement would involve things like screenshot, programatic 
> workout of positions seems not feasible
> ... inspector can in those cases not work out the distance
>
> Kim: So is this a roadblock - can we get around it?
>
> Jake: Cant see a solution apart form scoping to cases where offsets 
> are defined in picels
>
> Jon: Is this the same issue as with touch target size?
>
> Jake: No, that one is always measurable in pixels
>
> <jon_avila> I have to jump off. sorry
>
> Jake: Distance, if not defined in pixels, you can only guess - no 
> margins, paddings defined
>
> Kim: How often does this happen?
>
> Jake: The more these Techniques are used the more difficult it gets
> ... If it is not 100% testable we don't even need to ask that question 
> - asking Wilco will probably have the same result
> ... you can measure every pixel on screen but there are many variations
> ... screenshot-based will be very awkward
>
> Detlev (describing way of measuring)
>
> Jake: When elements are close it could be 5,7 8 pixels, difficult to judge
>
> Detlev: Use a ruler?
>
> Jake: give it a background, see the touch area - it is an option but 
> not easy
>
> Detlev: was linked with target size - uncoupled it is less valuable 
> (not as important for large targets)
>
> Jake: We can look for elements without background padding positioned 
> via flex / % we can ask people if they think it can be measured and 
> discuss
>
> Kim: Will we ask Wilco, will this be useful?
>
> Jake: We can ask him
>
> Kim: would be good
>
> Jake: Can ask him, send an email
>
> Detlev: Wondering if anything is in the works for single point 
> activation for swiping / dragging, also for SR users on mobile - if 
> not, we should try to put it in for 2.2
>
>
>     Summary of Action Items
>
> *[NEW]* *ACTION:* Detlev read doc, give feedback
>
>
>     Summary of Resolutions
>
> [End of minutes]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David 
> Booth's scribe.perl 
> <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm> 
> version 1.154 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>)
> $Date: 2019/06/20 16:21:06 $
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________
>
> Kimberly Patch
>
> www.redstartsystems.com <http://www.redstartsystems.com>
> - making speech fly
>
> PatchonTech.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch>
> @PatchonTech
> www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch <http://www.linkedin.com/in/kimpatch>
> ___________________________________________________
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ATTENTION:
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Detlev Fischer
Testkreis
Werderstr. 34, 20144 Hamburg

Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45

http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites

Received on Friday, 21 June 2019 16:25:05 UTC