Minutes of meeting of 11 February 2016

HTML Minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2016/02/11-mobile-a11y-minutes.html

Text of minutes:

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

              Mobile Accessibility Task Force Teleconference

11 Feb 2016

    See also: [2]IRC log

       [2] http://www.w3.org/2016/02/11-mobile-a11y-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Alistair, Chrism, David, JF, Jatin, Kim, alan, jeanne,
           jon_avila

    Regrets
           Jan, Marc, Henny

    Chair
           Kimberly_Patch

    Scribe
           jeanne

Contents

      * [3]Topics
          1. [4]Revisions to 2.5.3 Failure from Jonathan
             https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobile-a11
             y-tf/2016Feb/0008.html
          2. [5]Continue through SC's -
             https://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-Extension/#touch-and
             -pointer
      * [6]Summary of Action Items
      * [7]Summary of Resolutions
      __________________________________________________________

    <Kim> clear agenda

    <scribe> scribe: jeanne

Revisions to 2.5.3 Failure from Jonathan
[8]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobile-a11y-tf/2016Feb
/0008.html

       [8] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mobile-a11y-tf/2016Feb/0008.html

    github version:
    [9]http://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-TF-Note/Techniques/FM001

       [9] http://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-TF-Note/Techniques/FM001

    <David> can you drop it in again

    <David> I just got in

    [10]https://github.com/w3c/Mobile-A11y-Extension

      [10] https://github.com/w3c/Mobile-A11y-Extension

    <Kim>
    [11]http://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-TF-Note/Techniques/FM001

      [11] http://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-TF-Note/Techniques/FM001

    <Kim>
    [12]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page

      [12] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page

    <Kim>
    [13]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Technique_Dev
    elopment_Assignments

      [13] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/Technique_Development_Assignments

    KP: introduces where work is stored

    <alan_smith> Request for link to scribe instructions that I
    lost as I changed jobs.

    Group home page: [14]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/

      [14] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/

    RESOLUTION: Accept updates to the FM001 Failure of 2.5.3

Continue through SC's -
[15]https://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-Extension/#touch-and-pointer

      [15] https://w3c.github.io/Mobile-A11y-Extension/#touch-and-pointer

    <David> An web page has

    KP: We have worked on touch target size last week.

    2.5.4 was finished last week

    Looking at 2.5.5

    Device manipulation

    AG: Is that shaking the device? Is there a definition for
    device manipulation?

    AS: I am also concerned at the choice of words. SOme devices
    have a stylus, where the main control is not a gesture.
    ... when "device interaction is required" is what I am thinking
    about.

    DM: If there are any physical manipulation that are beyond
    touch and keyboard, there must be a touch and keyboard
    alternative. For example, a shaking gesture might be impossible
    for someone with a chair mounted device. They need another
    touch or keyboard means of interacting.

    AG: maybe instead of device manipulation maybe we should use
    motion control. We are using the device as a motion controller.
    Shaking, tilt, roll, thrust, wave

    CM: I can wave at the camera.

    AS: Voice input as well.

    <jon_avila> what about other device manipluation such as the
    mute button

    KP: there are other sounds as well.

    <jon_avila> It's much more than just movement

    JF: We have the technology today that is gesture in front of
    the camera.

    DM: I think we should break them into broad categories --

    CM: We need a broad term and then specific techniques

    DM: Gestures are too specific a term.

    JF: If everyone on the call recognizes "device manipulation",
    then just define it and use the term.

    AG: I think "physical device manipulation"

    <jon_avila> Article about different types of
    interactions/manipulations
    [16]http://uwdata.github.io/hcid520/readings/Hinckley-SensingMo
    bile.pdf

      [16] http://uwdata.github.io/hcid520/readings/Hinckley-SensingMobile.pdf

    DM: manipulation is physical.

    AG: We need to separate out the touch aspect.

    <David> Definition of manjipulation : to move or control
    (something) with your hands or by using a machine

    <David>
    [17]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manipulate

      [17] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manipulate

    <jon_avila> holding, proximity, touch, voice, walking, shaking,
    looking at, angle of holding, etc.

    AG: We may have to say that visual is different and covered in
    a different section. Voice input is different and covered in a
    different section

    DM: We haven't talked about holding your hand to the camera is
    another area that we need to work in.

    KP: We are talking about physical movement of the phone for
    this SC.

    DM: It would be a different success criterion for visual and
    voice input.

    KP: Physical, visual to the camera, voice to the microphone.

    <jon_avila> Are device buttons covered here or somewhere else?

    AG: It is interaction with the phone without using the screen.

    DM: Would we also want to include GPS as another issue? I think
    that is independent of the user.
    ... I think we should not address the issues of how the device
    operates without interaction with the user (GPS, accelerometer,
    etc)

    <JF> +1

    JS: I think we should capture the issues with input, and addres
    them later, and we should focus on finishing 2.5 Touch.

    <David> David: want to distinguish between the device
    relationship to the person, and the device relationship to the
    evnironment. Mike, camera and shaking are related to the
    person, whereas GPS, accelerator, height measurement etc are
    the devices relationship to the environment.

    CM: Then device manipulation doesn't belong under touch.

    <David> David: I think we need to address the device
    relationship to person, but not device relationship to
    environment.

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

     1. [18]Accept updates to the FM001 Failure of 2.5.3

    [End of minutes]

Received on Saturday, 13 February 2016 10:46:31 UTC