Re: Perhaps we can follow the LVTF and close a few of our proposals

Sorry the non interference one is #71

- Issue 71 Non- Interference of AT
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/71

Here it is with corrected link

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:13 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> Sorry the non interference one is #71
>
> - Issue 71 Non- Interference of AT
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/7
> <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72>1
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:22 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> The LVTF has reviewed their submitted issues and closed 5 of them. So
>> they have gone from 14 to 9 submitted SCs to the larger WG. Perhaps we can
>> take a similar initiative to close several of our 14. Any work we can do at
>> the TF level to tighten up our list, will help the Working Group, given
>> that there are currently 63 Proposed SCs and many will have to be dropped.
>> I would like to propose we close some of the less mature ones unless some
>> of us feel strongly that they:
>>
>> - Can be cleaned up to meet the acceptance requirements of a Success
>> Criteria https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteri
>> - Will help significant numbers of people with disabilities overcome a
>> known barrier
>> - Can be tested reasonably easily
>> - Can be accomplished clearly and easily by devs
>>
>> I've closed out Issue #3 which was M16
>>
>> I propose we close the following:
>>
>> - Issue 61 Pointer Gestures
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/61
>>
>>
>> - Issue 62 Keyboard with AT (that remaps key input)
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/62
>>
>> - Issue 64 Concurrent Input Mechanisms
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/64
>>
>> - Issue 72 Non- Interference of AT
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/72
>>
>> To my mind most of these are mostly covered in the standard, do not
>> promise to make huge differences in the lives of people with disabilities,
>> and would require bandwidth we don't have to bring up to the level of the
>> others. This will save us, and the group about 100 hours, literally, and would
>> leave us with 10 tight mature SC submissions and will help set an example
>> for COGA to follow LVTF and MATF in closing some issues.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>
>

Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 03:55:03 UTC