- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:12:10 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
On 25 September 2012 17:18, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > On 25/09/2012 17:12, John Cowan wrote: >> >> Quite so, since CDATA sections only reduce the number of WF failures >> without eliminating them. You still have the problem of stray "]]>" >> and of non-XML characters. > > > Yes I wasn't saying it should be different just pushing Andrew to expand > on how he hoped micro-xml would help (unless of course you view just not > allowing people to try using CDATA as helping, which isn't an > unreasonable position to take) Yep, if they can't use cdata sections: a) they will have to search for an alternative, hopefully discovering microxml writers and b) I wont have to deal with that sort of xml win win :) -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 17:12:38 UTC