- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:08:32 +0100
- To: stephengreenubl@gmail.com
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, public-microxml@w3.org
On 25 September 2012 13:06, Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote: > Aim towards a comparison of benchmarks for XML parsers v > MicroXML parsers (both with MicroXML documents, of course)? > In the hope that a by-product of simplicity could be improved > performance and lower memory requirements? (Besides less > pain for parser writers and users.) To put things into a perspective, this is an example of some xml I see now and again (the most recent being today): <aa><![CDATA[1.12345]]></aa> <bb><![CDATA[12312]]></bb> <cc><![CDATA[0.345]]></cc> ...yep, every value is serialized in a cdata section. This is usually because it was constructed as a string and written to disk, and a lone & or < caused a well-formedness error, and the quick-fix is to add the cdata sections to the string construction. Hopefully its this sort of thing microxml will help fix... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 15:09:09 UTC