Re: New editors' draft

Fine with me too.

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net> wrote:
>
>> On 09/11/2012 08:19 AM, Stephen D Green wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> later:
>>>  "A MicroXML parser is still conforming if it fails to meet the
>>> requirements of the first paragraph of this section only because of
>>> limitations of computing resources."
>>> Not sure about the use of MUST in the first paragraph. It seems to be
>>> pointless making it a MUST if that is then weakened later to say there is
>>> some vague category of parser which breaks the conformance requirement but
>>> is allowed to do so because it somehow can't keep it. That just sounds like
>>> a SHOULD.
>>>
>>>  Personally, I would strike the second paragraph (caveat about OOME,
>> etc) - I think this falls under the "acts of god" clause and goes without
>> saying
>
>
> Just striking that would be OK by me as well.
>
>
> --
> Uche Ogbuji                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
> Founding Partner, Zepheira        http://zepheira.com
> http://wearekin.org
> http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
> http://copia.ogbuji.net
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
> http://twitter.com/uogbuji
>
>