- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:18:11 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua1fJPw2Qn6=4wXB88psRsRuzOSUYzYLowNiduBD5SqrQA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>wrote: > >> -1 to anything external to the document affecting its content. > > > > > > Hang on. Does that really mean you oppose transformation stages in an > XML > > toolchain? If not, can you clarify? > > No (why would anyone oppose that?!) I mean things like the DTD or XSD > defaulting values, so you get a different input document depending on > whether it's been validated or not. It sounded like (from my skim > reading) that the namespace would be held in an external file, similar > to when I've seen the xmlns defaulted in the DTD... > But no one has proposed that the *MicroXML parse* step would make any such changes. Even if your skim reading was correct, it would not be applicable because John made it clear that would be a separate step (i.e. a transformation stage in the toolchain). So I think it was natural for me to be thrown pretty badly by what you said. I noticed John was, too. Anyway seems we're all on the same page now. -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 16:18:43 UTC