- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:06:05 -0400
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 21:33 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > 6. Are bare DOCTYPE declarations allowed? If we are to have HTML5 > valid documents that are also MicroXML, bare DOCTYPEs will be needed. > No consensus so far. No strong opinion, except it's non-minimal crud. Maybe <!DOCTYPE sock> is useful, but I'm not really sure to whom or why. I always hated that <!DOCTYPE...> wasn't allowed _inside_ XML documents. That would have been awesomely something or other. -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml Co-author, 5th edition, "Begining XML", Wrox, Summer 2012.
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 04:06:24 UTC