- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:40:31 +0200
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:35 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > James Clark scripsit: > >> The Canonical MicroXML for a document is the unique MicroXML document that > > My proposal for this: "The canonical form of a MicroXML document is the > MicroXML document that" (etc.) > > The use of "the" indicates uniqueness. > >> Is this worth including in the spec? > > I haven't tried, but I think it would fit into the free half-page at the end. > If so, I'd be in favor of it. (MicroXML is still smaller than JSON.) +1 J > > -- > John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan > It's the old, old story. Droid meets droid. Droid becomes chameleon. > Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back > again. It's a classic tale. --Kryten, Red Dwarf
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 14:41:02 UTC