W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-microxml@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Canonical MicroXML

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:40:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mtU4WuWWFwbfL1OqhWK9ST7CDby1yUqtDUe1fVb7CO3mw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:35 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> James Clark scripsit:
>
>> The Canonical MicroXML for a document is the unique MicroXML document that
>
> My proposal for this:  "The canonical form of a MicroXML document is the
> MicroXML document that" (etc.)
>
> The use of "the" indicates uniqueness.
>
>> Is this worth including in the spec?
>
> I haven't tried, but I think it would fit into the free half-page at the end.
> If so, I'd be in favor of it.  (MicroXML is still smaller than JSON.)

+1

J
>
> --
> John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
> It's the old, old story.  Droid meets droid.  Droid becomes chameleon.
> Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back
> again.  It's a classic tale.  --Kryten, Red Dwarf
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 14:41:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 October 2012 14:41:02 GMT