W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-microxml@w3.org > October 2012

sanity check

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:18:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mvx7vYARb4_SbC+4++-kiJ-PJu6vT9o3DZwTbXk=LM7Pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-microxml@w3.org

a few random thoughts;

* any comments with respect to microxml and the following ?

* in '5 Security Considerations' we assume that XML Canonization is a
security issue only, we may want to separate this out, pointing out
the various links to http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n11/ . Worried that
this important information is being buried here.

* I think the '1. Introduction' is far too verbose and could do with
stating very clearly the differences in non normative terms with XML
1.0 right up front or perhaps just a link to B.1 Syntax is all that is

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 06:19:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:12:11 UTC