- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:25:54 +0100
- To: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 26 July 2012 12:17, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:26 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > >> Actually I am less convinced that the xml-stylesheet PI is a good >> argument for keeping them. The intention here is presumably to link to >> an XSLT stylesheet and presumably XSLT will be full XML so this is only >> of use to micro-xml consumers that also have a full XML processing stack >> available. > > I had been more imagining people linking to CSS. I would hope that > MicroXML would attract people who were not currently using XML; such > people are likely at first to use CSS as their style language. > > James You commented that those using XML and the stylesheet PI were 'rare'. I'd suggest that those using XML with CSS are equally rare? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 11:26:26 UTC