- From: Rushforth, Peter <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:48:56 +0000
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- CC: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
> > This isn't quite right. MicroXML would still need to allow at > least some prefixes on attributes (xml:, xlink: and xmlns:) > so as to be able to represent the namespaced attributes that > occur in the HTML syntax of HTML5. Why would you want to include xlink in MicroXML? It is not fit for the web, and will drag in namespaces with it. Even bare href, type, etc with no scoping is better, IMHO. But, see the XML Hypermedia community group for more discussion on this topic. Peter
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 13:49:29 UTC