Re: A really micro schema language

James Clark scripsit:

> What's crucial is that a basic RSSL implementation that doesn't handle eg
> XPath2 or JavaScript can ignore these extensions.

+1

You once said that you thought the appropriate MicroXPath was XPath 1.0,
presumably modulo namespaces, PIs, etc.  Have you had any further
thoughts about that?

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan
The penguin geeks is happy / As under the waves they lark
The closed-source geeks ain't happy / They sad cause they in the dark
But geeks in the dark is lucky / They in for a worser treat
One day when the Borg go belly-up / Guess who wind up on the street.

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 11:35:40 UTC