- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:04:24 +0100
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
>> If xml:id isn't going to infer any automatic ID property and basically >> it works in the same way as id (or any other attribute) then many >> language designers (and I'm sue most users) would prefer just to use >> id= rather than xml:id=. > > I wouldn't, because I think having a universal affordance is a fine idea > here. I would expect more people to intuitively guess the meaning of id= than xml:id= Or maybe user-id= or email= or phone= etc... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 10:04:51 UTC