- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:05:28 -0600
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua1iKxCPwb3+HZnppJ1O9uVBKgrm-Ue6wX5EAfp-Fi_50g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 August 2012 23:25, Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com> wrote: > > > I don't see what's so hard to get about uXML. > > > > Murray > > > > Which perhaps exemplifies the 'them and us' gap of which David Lee speaks? > > A long standing beef with W3C/ISO is that they write for implementers. > Perhaps, not being a document targeted for rec status could address this > and produce the user guide to accompany a spec, to provide rationale, > explanations and 'the sales pitch'? > > If uXML is written only for the expert > Yesterday I wrote in two separate messages that it's not only for the XML expert. I see nothing in MicroXML so far that would exclude the novice. I agree it simply won't gain traction. There really is nothing to respond to such assertions but "we shall see." And I think that's the last thing I'll be saying in response to questions such as "what's the point of MicroXML?" I'm turning my attention now strictly to its development. -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 13:06:01 UTC