Re: comment received during PR review:

Ha, that's indeed funny. :-)

We have a few comments now - how do we go about fixing them without
going through the whole process again?

Silvia.

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:
> Here is an editorial comment received during PR review:
>
> <<
> In 7.5 it says "A URI scheme for such a Web page may involve
> ampersand-separated name-value pairs as defined in this specification, e.g.
> http://example.com/videopage.html#t=60,100."
> Choose another example, as there is no ampersand in this one.
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>
>        ~~Yves
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 05:18:30 UTC