- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:21:51 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Fine by me. Thanks! Silvia. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2012, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > >> Dear Silvia, >> >>> We have a few comments now - how do we go about fixing them without >>> going through the whole process again? >> >> >> Since there are editorial comments, I will make a change proposal and we >> will do a short telecon early June to validate all of them before going >> happily into full recommendation. We are close to the end. > > > As early june is quite far, I made a snapshot version of what the REC would > look like, implementing the two proposed changes, one for the "bad" example > [1] and one for the clarification of intent [2]. See the diff doc at [3] to > find those edits. > > Raphael, Silvia, Erik, Davy, is that ok for you? > Cheers, > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2012May/0001.html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2012May/0000.html > [3] > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/snapshot/rec/basic/diff-mediafrag.html > > > -- > Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. > > ~~Yves >
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 05:22:41 UTC