> I was suggesting (ii) because the idea of the commas is not one that > I've seen used more widely than ampersands and it screw with our spec, > where commas have a different meaning. FWIW, +1 for (ii) then from my side… -- Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc. http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayacReceived on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 23:58:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 February 2012 23:58:36 GMT